Monday, April 28, 2014

The Rube That Came In From The Cold


Shooting Off Her Mouth Again, But Not In a Good Way

Indianapolis, Indiana
April 28, 2014

With all the recent hullabaloo over racially ignorant statements from stupid white people it’s easy to forget there are other ways to be incredibly pathetic. That’s why we have Sarah Palin, who just dares us over and over to keep kicking her around. The ever lovely and talented hateful and twisted Ms. Palin addressed the NRA’s annual meeting in Indianapolis this past Saturday. She waxed moronic about how things would be different if she was president, including a blissfully ignorant ode to waterboarding, or as it is known across the world and by most Americans, including the nitwit responsible for Palin ever leaching out of the Alaskan wilderness, John McCain - TORTURE.

Sarah Palin attempts to use her “brain” to form words

First Palin had to get in touch with her inner paranoiac over the imaginary assault on the ever-misinterpreted Second Amendment and all that it doesn’t actually stand for, “See, our patience is running thin. It’s being teased and tempted by some intellectual elite in some far distant capital wanting us to abandon even the ideas of the American Revolution." I understand why she hates intellectuals, but where is this far distant capital of which she squeaks? 

She Just Can’t Get Enough of Herself

America’s Biggest Loser was on one of her countless liberal-bashing jags when her mouth began to swerve out of control, “I do have to apologize for that. I am sorry. Not all intolerant, anti-freedom, leftist liberals are hypocrites. I'm kidding, yes they are. And they are not right. The policies that poke our allies in the eye and coddle adversaries instead of putting the fear of God in our enemies. Come on! Enemies who would utterly annihilate America. They obviously have information on plots to carry out jihad. Oh, but you can’t offend them, can’t make them feel uncomfortable, not even a smidgen. Well, if I were in charge, they would know that waterboarding is how we baptize terrorists.” 

Now unless I’m missing something, the insipid ex-half-term-governor of Alaska, who bailed on her constituents to avoid quitting by staying on the job, just lobbed a heaping pile of disrespect on the United States Department of Justice, International Law and Jesus H. Christ all in one memorable phrase. When asked the following day if she stood by her remarks, the Empty One chirped, “Would I make it again? Why wouldn’t I, yeah, absolutely. Terrorists who want to annihilate Americans, innocent Americans, our children – whatever it takes to stop them. If I were in charge, I’d be stoppin’ em.” At least she didn’t finish with, “'I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro.”


I. Mangrey reporting.
Thanks for listening. Removable content inevitable.

Friday, April 11, 2014

Citizens (United) Gone Wild, Part 2



You Bought It, You Broke It

Wa$$hington, DC
April 10, 2014

Maybe I'm just jealous. Who knows, maybe if I made $123,000 a year I would just buy myself some politicians. You know what they say: Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day, teach a man how to fish and he'll eat forever, give a man his own politician and he can make other people bring him all the fish he wants, when he wants for as long as he wants and he doesn't have to do any work whatsoever. I may have paraphrased, but you get the drift. $upreme Court Chief Jackass Justice John Roberts would have us believe that nobody gives huge sums of money to get someone elected in the hope that their money has no effect whatsoever on how that person governs. He actually said that...out loud...from the bench.

 
Billionaire Charles Koch - proud owner of many politicians all across this great land - in his recent The Wall Street Journal op-ed piece entitled, I'm Fighting to Restore a Free Society: Instead of welcoming free debate, collectivists engage in character assassination, repeatedly referred to those who disagree with his philosophy of money-as-free-speech as collectivists. I guess the man tied with his brother for fourth richest in America can be forgiven for eschewing the use of the word communists, considering it too passé. Koch whined in Rupert Murdoch's pages, "The central belief and fatal conceit of the current administration is that you are incapable of running your own life, but those in power are capable of running it for you. This is the essence of big government and collectivism." Lest we forget, these Koch brothers sued their two other brothers to wrest their massive inheritance from their father who made his millions in oil and helped found the John Birch Society - the original Tea Party. So these guys know exactly how things work and who should be running things - white guys who were born on third base and act like they hit a triple.


The lead plaintiff in McCutcheon v. FEC, Shaun McCutcheon said "It's about freedom of speech and the government does not need to limit any Americans regardless of economic status." Yes the government that is already practically owned by corporations, the government that has lobbyists writing our laws (How many laws have you been asked to write?), should not be persecuting these poor rich people who otherwise have no say in public affairs. Everybody knows that the government's job is to persecute poor people who don't have money and to make sure they are hindered from voting. That's what a democracy is. And those are the kinds of policies the people Shaun McCutcheon thinks should be running a small (minded) government, believe in too.

Money is Speech, Voting is Passé 

RNC Chair Reince Priebus (Side note: Reince Priebus, also the Latin name for a small cave-dwelling mammal that never cleans itself and avoids predators by emitting a painful, high-pitched shriek while spitting a noxious substance that would make a skunk's eyes water.)beamed, "I am proud that the RNC led the way in bringing this case and pleased that the Court agreed that limits on how many candidates or committees a person may support unconstitutionally burden core First Amendment political activities. When free speech is allowed to flourish, our democracy is stronger." This from the party that spends most of its time illegally purging voter rolls of undesirable (non-white, non-conservative, non-rich) though completely legitimate voters, fighting to restrict voter access and putting out leaflets with the wrong dates in heavily Democratic districts. This from the party that knows and has publicly stated for decades that they know they cannot win if too many people vote. Next they will be passing laws requiring a pigment test in order to vote - it's not about race, just melanin.

In case you missed the recent New York Times headline: New G.O.P Bid to Limit Voting in Swing States, or this Slate headline: Cursed With Nation’s Second-Highest Turnout Rate, Wisconsin Restricts Early Voting, the GOP has been very busy exercising States' Rights to Beat Down The Vote, having taken control of many states. "After the frightening reality of having elected a black president we just can't let something like that happen again," chirped Koch Brothers-owned, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, adding, "If you let one of them become president then they'll all want to be president, and this is a white, Christian nation. We're just trying to protect the Voting Whites Act."

It's not just the Republican'ts standing in the way of voter participation. The same white-hooded black-robed five recently gutted the Voting Rights Act, thereby setting the stage for the states that inspired a need for voting rights to throw black folks caution to the wind and implement myriad roadblocks to keep all non-white, non-millionaires from casting ballots. The Feckless Five are convinced that money doesn’t have a corrupting influence on politics. They do believe that the real corrupting influence on politics is voters. Clearly they are channeling Abraham Lincoln in their quest for a government of the money, by the money and for the money. We're almost there.

Senate minority leader Mulch McConnell explained that rulings like Citizens United and McCutcheon “enable more citizens to be involved, more citizens to contribute to the candidates and causes that they believe in; that’s good for America.” The only good news is that since Global Climate Change is also apparently good for America, we won't have to put up with this crap for too much longer.

In Other News of The Greedy

Paul Ryan, super-genius of Republican't economic policy who still thinks they can repeal the Affordable Care Act after failing to do so over fifty times so far, released his "new" budget. It is his old budget with a different date on the cover page. He wants to privatize Medicare, cut food stamps and Medicaid while proposing to give huge tax breaks to households making over ONE MILLION DOLLARS. This refreshing new idea is bound to stimulate the economy…of households making over one million dollars. If I were you I'd start becoming a household making over one million dollars as soon as possible. The added bonus of course is this will enable you to own more members of Congress.

Maybe Mark Twain was right when he said, “If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it.”

I. Mangrey reporting.
Thanks for listening. I can't be bought, but it's worth a try.
Champagne contributions welcome.

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Is That A Wad Of Cash In Your Pocket, Or Are You Just Glad I'm Running For Office?



Citizens (United) Gone Wild

Wa$$hington, DC
April 4, 2014

What a surprise. Five wealthy white men (yes I'm including Uncle Thomas) once again decided to call money "free speech." Chief Justice Roberts, author of the decision said, "Spending large sums of money in connection with elections does not give rise to quid pro quo corruption, nor does the possibility that an individual who spends large sums may garner influence over elected officials." Because that just never happens, except for almost always. This would all be so much easier to talk about with a profanity-laden screed, but I'll try to keep it clean. No promises though. 


Citizens United just wasn't enough. Who needs spending limits on electioneering? If you don't have enough money to fund and influence politicians, then stop being so poor. It's really just that simple. Now with the latest ruling in McCutcheon v. FEC, the $upreme Court has heroically protected the free speech of the less than 600 individuals who gave the maximum allowable amount in 2012, but want to give more. Why do they want to give more money to elect certain politicians? For democracy! Certainly not to put people who will do their bidding. Perish the thought. Thomas Paine can finally rest in peace. 

Uncle Thomas, the Harpo Marx of the Court, just couldn't hold back this time. He didn't think the decision went far enough. Old Clarence, usually as silent a deadly fart, let us know in no uncertain terms that he believes there should be no limits whatsoever on donations to politicians. He wants even more money buying of elections…you know, One Dollar, One Vote. America’s richest 1% controls 40% of the nation’s wealth; shouldn’t they logically control 40% of the nation’s political process? Or 90%? It's called logic people. It's all about free speech. Very expensive free speech. I'm sure you agree that $123,000 isn't enough for a civic-minded individual to inject into the political vein. And after all, freedom's just another word for nothing left to buy.



The so-called liberals on the court, three of whom (Ginsburg, Breyer and Sotomayor) happen to be the wealthiest members of this most elite of clubs, railed against the latest attempt to stamp out democracy once and for all. They foolishly based their dissenting opinion on something they call The Constitution. Nobody believes that thing anymore, hell, it was printed on hemp.


Apparently justice is not just blind; it’s also morally bankrupt and fatally ignorant. The First Amendment was not meant to be something you buy by the pound…or the dollar.

TO BE CONTINUED…

I. Mangrey reporting.
Thanks for listening. Shamefully huge contributions invited.