Clarence
Thomas & The Extremes
July 1, 2023
The
Extreme Court does it again. Despite being currently under scrutiny for the
flagrant emolument binging exposed with Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito – two
of the most controversial justices, even before being caught with their bloody claws
in the cookie jar.
Their
latest perfidy sees to it that non-millionaires are not given unfair advantages
by shooting down Joe Biden’s attempt to forgive much of the economy and
personal financial well-being-crippling caused by inappropriately massive student debt.
But wait, there’s more. The Court also managed to squeeze some more backwards-lunging legislating-from-the-Bench with the new No-Shirt-No-Shoes-No-Hetero-No-Service decision. It remains unclear whether or not the Court has mandated separate LGBTQ+ water fountains.
The funnest
part of today’s fact is that reversal of the LGBTQ+ civil rights case above was
based on a fake plaintiff and a non-existent defendant. It was all hypothetical
– something every single Supreme Court nominee refuses to opine on during their
confirmation hearings. And something that should have no place in any
courtroom, let alone in front of the highest courtesan in the land. Oh, and in
the student loan forgiveness case the so-called plaintiff wanted nothing to do
with the case, but the valiant state of Missouri took it upon itself to speak
for the non-plaintiff.
Fun,
right?
Just thought you might like to know.
This has been your Paying Attention™ Fun Fact For The Day.
What can one man do, my friend?
ReplyDelete