April 27, 2024
The case could not be
more aptly named: Trump v. United States. After all, Trump has been opposed to
the United States for most of his unnecessary life. Trump’s lawyer, D.
John Mustard…I mean Sauer continued to use the same ridiculous, yet horrifying argument
in pleading before the Supremes that American presidents simply cannot function
if even a hint of culpability or responsibility to the laws of the land apply
to them. Ridiculous, because it has no basis in even alternate reality,
horrifying because all the thing’s men on the Court were happily wallowing
around in the feces-filled slop Sauer was spewing.
The only reason anyone is even talking about
this bullshit issue is because Sauer’s client – who just happens to be a
life-long conman, thief and very likely a serial rapist, not to mention his new
hobbies of election fraud, stealing classified documents and inciting insurrection
– has made a mockery of the presidency, democracy and the Constitution.
May It Disease The Court
No other president has caused the issue of
absolute presidential immunity to arise, with the possible exception of Richard
Nixon, who resigned in the face of impeachment after covering up his crimes
against the country. Because Nixon knew he would be pardoned by his hand-picked
successor because Nixon knew he could end up in court for his crimes against
the country – not to mention his crimes against humanity. Trump’s own attorney,
during one of his impeachment trials, insisted that his client should not be
impeached because he should instead be tried in civilian court once out of
office. Maybe this attorney figured Trump would never be out of office.
Speaking of crimes against humanity, or at
least crimes against the American public (well, against the segment – still in
the majority – of the American public who do not believe: Trump’s “hair” and
skin tone are natural, that he has many bibles in his “house” or that the January
6 coup attempt was just like a Girls Gone Wild video – while pretending to
adjudicate the (non-existent) matter of absolute presidential immunity, no
mention of the primary reason this absurd conversation even began was
permitted. That’s right the Goons Gone Wild, Washington DC Edition of January
6, 2021, which earned Trump a record-breaking second impeachment and an
invitation to federal court as the special guest of Jack Smith, was not part of
the pro-Trump hearing this past Thursday. Who says it can’t happen here?
The Court Of Last Distort
Human beer-soaked turd Brett Kavanaugh had the unmitigated gall to note that the pardoning of Nixon is “now looked upon as one of the better decisions in presidential history, I think by most people.” Au contraire, mon fuck-faced, rapey little shit frère. The pardoning of Nixon has left a stain a half-century long on this nation. And we still haven’t been able to shout it out.
So now, we await what should be a no-brainer
decision on a case that should never have gotten this far from Trump’s own,
owned Supreme Court. It seems frighteningly possible that – whether or not
there is such a thing as absolute presidential immunity* – the highly
unbalanced (in more ways than one) Court will nonetheless bestow it on Trump.
It will be no surprise, however horrific, for this court to upend the
Constitution for the umpteenth time, and with it our democracy (which they have
been working feverishly to accomplish for years), by deciding that the 45th
president has absolute immunity from prosecution.
The Trump majority is now planning on
dragging out a claim that should have taken all of 30 seconds to deny –
especially for all those self-proclaimed, dangerously deluded, so-called
“originalists” who claim to know the founders’ intent with every word they put
to parchment.
As we and countless others have noted many
times in many places, the founders themselves
did not always agree with each other, or even with themselves at times, so
there is no such thing as “original intent” when it comes to the Constitution.
The dishonest, and all-too-often blatantly hypocritical “originalist” hacks we
now have running roughshod over the highest court in the land pretend to revere
(much more than did the men who wrote the words) the letter of the law written some
250 years ago. Of course, those men who wrote those words never intended those
words to be immutable across the ages. These justices are not originalists so
much as absurdists.
“Criminal Court” May Not Mean What You Think It Means
And you can bet that if at least five of the
six current absurdists decide in Trump’s favor, they will make it a one-off,
just like they did in deciding to appoint George WTF Bush, who lost the 2000
election to Al Gore and became president nonetheless. And their decision will
include a rider that it only becomes effective on January 20, 2025 if Trump
takes the White House, just in case current president Joe Biden gets any funny
ideas about using this newly-created presidential super-power for himself
and/or to protect America from a second bite at the worm-infested Trump apple.
The Extreme Six unfortunately treat the
Constitution the way they treat the Bible. They say they revere every word, but
their actions betray their true feelings as they break their word with the god
they claim to serve above, the same way they do with those they are appointed
to serve here below. The words they claim to live by both privately and
professionally, religiously and politically, are not nearly as valuable to
these frauds as the paper any of the words is printed on. They simply pick and
choose which words to live by and which to laugh off.
This Just In…
It has just been revealed that some guy named
George Washington was a really big deal back in the day, it seems he was a
president and he’s getting more and more recognition these days. This
Washington guy said about the Constitution, “Its only keepers, the people.” I
believe he was referring to the “We The People” kind of mentioned in the
Constitution thingie, and not six assholes appointed by presidents.
Especially when one of the six is married to
a co-conspirator in an attempted coup and three of these lifetime-appointees
(including the one married to an insurrectionist) have massive conflicts of
interest, and two others were appointed under incredibly spurious circumstance.
And especially the current cash-crop most of whom were appointed by presidents
who lost the popular vote, you know, the vote that represents the will of We
The People (one of those presidents also lost the unpopular/Electoral College
vote, and was subsequently appointed by five of those Supreme Court assholes,
who simply decided to piss all over the Constitution and put their preferred
guy in office – an office he ultimately defecated all over).
This Washington guy – as did most of the
founders – believed that the Constitution was a living document that could, and
probably should be amended and improved over time. As times change, those
trying desperately to un-change them are gaining more and more momentum and
power.
It was fun while it lasted. Sort
of.
____________________________________________________
*Spoiler Alert: THERE ISN’T.
I. Mangrey for a change.
No comments:
Post a Comment