Clarence Fucking Thomas, Et Al
April 25, 2024
First things first. Sixty percent of adult Americans
disapprove of what the Supreme Court is doing. Be it overturning decades of
settled law, sabotaging democracy at every turn by gutting voting laws and
flooding elections with dark money (should be called “white money” since all of
it is coming from rich white assholes), consistently siding with corporations over the public welfare, or the blatant corruption of at least two
of the most self-enriching, anti-democratic justices which has recently come to light. This is
one fucked up Supreme Court. For the ages.
Today, at long last, after a lengthy and wholly unnecessary
delay (other than stalling like and for Trump) the Trump-packed Supreme Court
will pretend to hear oral arguments in the case wherein Donald Trump is claiming that he has absolute
and total immunity from prosecution because the Electoral College – the same
Electoral College that Trump refused to honor four years later, when it did not
hand him the presidency – deemed him president in 2016 for four of the worst years in
this nation’s nearly 250-year history.
The Court appears poised to waste another two months
dickering over an issue that deserved not one nanosecond of debate, especially
for those who claim to revere every word and presumed intent of the
Constitution. Presidents are not kings. Fuck these fuckers.
Pack The Court, Smack The Court, Do Some Fucking Thing
Self-loathing Uncle Thomas is at it again, burnishing his
horrific legacy as one of the most effective saboteurs of American democracy in
our nation's history (thanks Biden). After spending decades as the Court Mime, now
Uncle T will not shut the fuck up.
Thomas and his insurrectionist wife are hard at work, by
word and by deed, dissolving decorum, decency and democracy. That of course, is
when Monster T is not busy taking bribes from radical Christian billionaires.
After all, he’s mostly in it for the money.
If for no other reason (though reasons abound) Democrats
should pack the Supreme in order to offset CFT and the further damage he has
planned for this country. He already made it clear that he thinks
contraceptives and same sex marriage need to be "revisited." Thomas
recently questioned whether the attempted violent overthrow of the government
by homegrown terrorists allied with Donald Trump (well beyond merely aided and
abetted by CFT’s nutjob wife) was just like any other protest. Nothing to see here, and if there was something to see, no one had anything to do with it. Thomas
had to be figuratively spanked by Justice Sonya Sotomayor, who in a truly just
world would have instead walked a few seats down the bench and slapped his
sorry ass silly, and then gone and sat back down.
While Thomas is nothing if not a corrupt, white nationalist
Christo-fascist, the Court's top buffoon and annoying splinter on the bench
Neil Gorsuch – only barely claiming the top spot from Amy Clowny Barrett – is trying to compare the murderous,
coup-happy mob who ransacked the Capitol, assaulted law enforcement, destroyed
and stole property, threatened the lives of legislators and desperately wanted to hang the vice
president, and defecated in the halls of the Capitol in service to stopping the
certification of a free and fair election, to Rep. Jamal Bowman (D-NY) pulling
a fire alarm to delay a vote.
These Supreme fuckers are desperately trying to get their
lard and savior Donald Trump off the hook for trying the end democracy in
America. And every other fucking horrific deed he has ever done or ever will
do if given half a chance.
Justices are expected to recuse themselves when even the
appearance of conflict of interests exist. Some might consider it a conflict of
interest when the defendant’s co-conspirator is married to one or more (who
knows what these freaks are doing behind our backs – other than Thomas and
Alito openly taking bribes from filthy-rich white men who stand to benefit from
their “friendship”) of the justices. Others might be more interested in having
those who were appointed by the defendant recuse themselves for the most
obvious and clear-cut reasons in the history of jurisprudence. Or maybe it’s
just me.
Just me, I. Mangrey.
No comments:
Post a Comment