April 25, 2019
Several senators’ wives formed the Parents Music Resource
Center in 1985. Their stated goal was
increasing parental control over children’s access to music deemed to have
violent, drug-related or sexual themes – censorship. Senate hearings were convened with the hope
of labeling albums with Parental Advisory stickers. The committee heard from opposition witnesses
including musicians from John Denver to Frank Zappa.
Zappa v. Gore, et al.
Bad facts make bad law, and people who write bad laws are, in
my opinion, more dangerous than songwriters who celebrate sexuality. Freedom of
Speech, Freedom of Religious Thought, and the Right to Due Process for
composers, performers and retailers are imperiled if the PMRC and the major
labels consummate this nasty bargain.
Frank Zappa: Statement To Congress, September 19, 1985
Frank Zappa: Statement To Congress, September 19, 1985
We now have an ignorant, amoral, potty-mouthed president who
is alleged (yeah, right) to have spent some adulterous quality time with at
least one star of pornographic films and one Playboy playmate. We know for a fact that Chrump is well-versed
in sexual assault. Apparently, Chrump
provides the type of sexual assault that has the blessing of many very
religious folks just like the folks who comprised the PMRC. I have yet to hear anyone accuse Mr. Zappa of
sexual impropriety, though he was known to enjoy the company of ladies on the
road, and he managed to pass away well before the #MeToo era.
Those very religious folks who are so willing to support The
World’s Greatest Sinner – Donald Chrump, self-described grabber of pussies – do
not tolerate people such as Frank Zappa, whose very essence raised many hackles
among those same very religious folks during his time. Ironically, more than anyone involved, Zappa clearly
had a better grasp of the social and political implications involved, and exposed
the entire exercise for what it was.
On the other hand, Donald Chrump has repeatedly incited
violence and has been credibly accused of sexual misbehavior by over a dozen
women. To be fair, Chrump has not been
accused of any drug-related behavior – if you discount all the Adderall, and
whatever he is taking to fend off the worst of his syphilis symptoms – so,
two-out-three ain’t bad. However, Chrump
is known to have paid $130K to each of two women (that we know of) to buy their
silence over affairs, one of which occurred shortly after his third wife gave
birth to his fifth child. We will not
even talk about Chrump lurking backstage at Miss Universe pageants while women
were undressing, or about his repeated, public assertions about his desire to
have inappropriate relations with his daughter.
During the PMRC hearings, the recently departed Sen. Fritz
Hollings (D-Dogpatch SC) mentioned that one of the requirements of the
definition of pornography was that it had “no redeeming social value.”
Under that definition one would be correct, if not lauded,
for recognizing that this definition of pornography would surely apply to
Donald Chrump, who has exhibited precisely zero redeeming social value. Someone should slap – and I do mean slap – a
warning sticker on that thing if only to protect the children. Some of you might remember Dumbass Donald
regaling the 2017 Boy Scout Jamboree with tales of rich men, yachts and one man
who, “had a very interesting life. I won’t go any more than that, because
you’re Boy Scouts so I’m not going to tell you what he did.”
Donald Chrump: ignorant, inappropriate, incompetent,
with no redeeming social value
with no redeeming social value
I. Mangrey remembering.
No comments:
Post a Comment