January 17, 2019
Let the record show that he
was, in fact, a lying fucking crook.
As you, unless you are in a coma – voluntarily or otherwise
– probably know, new stories have emerged about the FBI’s counterintelligence
investigation into whether or not Donald J. Chrump was working on behalf of
Vladimir Putin during and after his presidential campaign. You are likely asking yourself – and anyone
within earshot, “Whatever, who the hell doesn’t already know that?” The Idiot King practically demanded he be
investigated when he told Lester Holt – on national television – in May of 2017,
that after talking to himself about himself, he decided to fire James Comey
because of “that Russia thing.” There
have been countless other reasons to investigate Chrump’s subservience to
Russia of course, but that one is pretty tough to beat, as far as irrefutable evidence. To Chrump’s credit, he is working diligently on it.
This seems to be the only thing he is actually working on. Many people are hoping his hard work pays
off.
Chrump is also working extremely hard to advance Russian
interests now that he is in the White House, while simultaneously seeing to it
that the American government remains shut down for no good reason. Only Republican’ts are hoping this hard work pays off. After all, they have been trying to stop our
government from working for decades.
The day after what many are calling a “bombshell” (fingers
crossed) report in the New York Times, Chrump the Cowardly Liar scurried to his
happy place at Fux News. Fux host/lunatic Jeanine Pirro, presumably planning to
toss her fellow lunatic Donald Chrump the softest of softball questions,
croaked, “I’m going to ask you, are you now or have you ever worked for Russia,
Mr. President?” Chrump went on a tirade
covering much ground, but not including the one-word answer Pirro was likely
expecting – NO. Chrump offered up his
usual smorgasbord of crazy talk, but never said NO.
He attacked Comey, the press, the FBI, Mueller, Santa Claus and the
Milky Way, but he never uttered the word NO.
At least he is not a crook…just
kidding…totally kidding.
Two days after the Pirro fiasco, after everyone
in the world, with the exception of Fux News, expressed absolute shock that
Putin’s Plant, the man who lies more than he breathes – and much more easily –
could not manage to clearly, succinctly deny working for Russia, Chrump finally
lied publicly from the White House lawn, “I never worked for Russia. Not only did I never work for Russia, I think
it’s a disgrace that you even asked that question because it’s a whole big, fat
hoax.” One assumes he was responding to
his own reflection when he uttered the words “big, fat hoax.”
This guy.
Nothing* is More
Counter-intelligent Than Chrump
Given these latest revelations, many people are wondering why
Trump went out of his way to ensure that no records of his meetings with
Russian President Vladimir Putin exist? Odds are he ate them, which he has been known to do to destroy evidence. And
why he gave classified information to Russians in the Oval Office? And if he
has serious, significant, irreversible brain damage?
Trump went to extraordinary lengths to conceal his
conversations with Putin. On at least
one occasion he confiscated the notes of his own interpreter (the only
non-Russian permitted to attend the meeting – Huh?) with instructions (threats?)
not to discuss what they had witnessed, not even with other administration
officials. Clearly, nothing suspicious
going on. Fortunately for Chrump, the Kremlin is there to
back him up. On Wednesday, top Russian
officials dismissed allegations that Chrump could have worked for Moscow’s
interests, as “absurd” and “stupid.” But
were they talking about the allegations or about Chrump himself? We may never know.
Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the
meeting transcripts that are missing. I
think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.
__________________________
*Grammarians would insist this should be “No one”, but I must respectfully disagree. That would imply sentience.
*Grammarians would insist this should be “No one”, but I must respectfully disagree. That would imply sentience.
No comments:
Post a Comment